Loblaw and Sobeys Stores Caught Overcharging for Underweight Meat Again
Grocers Overcharge for Meat by Including Packaging Weight

Major Grocery Chains Repeatedly Overcharge for Meat Products

A recent CBC investigation has uncovered that Loblaw-owned and Sobeys-affiliated stores continue to overcharge customers for underweight meat products, despite previous commitments to address this ongoing issue. This marks the second time in recent years that these grocery giants have been caught engaging in these deceptive pricing practices.

Secret Investigation Reveals Widespread Overcharging

In a comprehensive undercover operation, CBC investigators visited 17 different grocery stores across Toronto, Vancouver, and Halifax. Using precise kitchen scales, they weighed fresh meat products in their full packaging and compared the results to the net weight declared on product labels. The investigation revealed that numerous products were significantly underweight, leading to systematic overcharging.

"People are getting ripped off," stated Terri Lee, a former Canadian Food Inspection Agency inspector who spoke with CBC about the findings. Lee emphasized that the CFIA must impose substantial fines on grocers who persistently fail to comply with proper weighing regulations.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Pattern of Violations Across Multiple Stores

The investigation specifically identified violations at two Farm Boy locations in the Greater Toronto Area (owned by Empire Foods, Sobeys' parent company), two Safeways and Thrifty Foods stores in North Vancouver, and two Loblaw-owned Superstores in the Halifax region. These stores collectively sold 32 underweight meat products during the two-month investigation period.

The overcharging ranged from 2% to 16.7% above the proper price. One particularly egregious example involved Farm Boy adding an extra $1.35 to a package of two organic chicken breasts originally priced at $9.42. These discrepancies represent significant breaches of federal regulatory standards governing food packaging and pricing.

History of Similar Violations

This is not the first time Canadian grocery companies have been caught overcharging for meat. In early 2025, CBC exposed similar practices where stores included packaging weight in their pricing calculations. At that time, Loblaw characterized the issue as an error, and the CFIA declined to issue any fines, accepting the company's assurance that the problem had been resolved.

Dr. Sylvain Charlebois, director of the Agri-Food Analytics Lab and frequent columnist, explained the regulatory framework in detail last year: "Canada's Maximum Allowable Deficiency for pre-packaged goods varies based on weight. There is no tolerance for packages under 50 grams, a 1.5% margin for packages between 50 grams and 1 kilogram, and 15 grams plus 1.5% for packages over 1 kilogram. Being off by 10% is not just an oversight, it's a serious violation."

Consumer Impact During Economic Challenges

These pricing discrepancies occur during a period when Canadians are already struggling with rising food costs. Government data indicates that grocery prices have increased by approximately 30% since 2021, making these overcharging practices particularly burdensome for consumers.

Karen Webber, a retired principal from Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, expressed her frustration to CBC: "They can't be making money off of extra packaging. That's just wrong." Her sentiment reflects growing consumer concern about fair pricing practices in the grocery sector.

Corporate Responses and Regulatory Action

Following the investigation, Loblaw issued an apology and announced it would review protocols with its staff. A spokesperson for Sobeys and Empire stated they are investigating the matter but noted that such products are weighed and packaged in facilities they believe to be CFIA-certified.

The CFIA clarified that it does not certify facilities and that companies themselves bear responsibility for complying with federal regulations. While the agency has increased enforcement activities since 2025, it has primarily issued warnings rather than fines. The current maximum penalty for such violations stands at $15,000, but the government is reportedly reviewing these limits to ensure they serve as effective deterrents.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration

This ongoing issue highlights the tension between corporate pricing practices and consumer protection regulations, particularly as food costs continue to rise across Canada. The repeated nature of these violations suggests systemic problems that may require more substantial regulatory intervention to protect consumers from unfair pricing practices.