University Takes Action After Disruptive Protest
Concordia University has indefinitely barred Julianna Smith, a staff member of the Concordia Student Union (CSU), from all university property. This decisive action follows her alleged involvement in protest activities that occurred on October 6, 2025.
The situation escalated to the point where, on October 7, 2025, Concordia University became the only university globally to close its doors. This closure, coinciding with the two-year anniversary of the terrorist attack in Israel, was implemented out of concern for the safety of the entire campus community.
Details of the Campus Disruption
On October 6, a group of approximately 30 masked protesters entered Concordia's downtown campus. Their actions included interrupting classes and a midterm exam. When Campus Safety and Prevention Services (CSPS) requested they leave, the group refused.
The disruption intensified as the protesters began pounding on lockers and using a bullhorn for chanting. After several warnings, security personnel escorted the group out. However, the incident did not conclude peacefully.
One protester assaulted a security guard and was later arrested and charged with assault. This individual was allegedly in possession of a metal bar and incendiary devices. Another protester activated a fire alarm and was charged with public mischief. It was subsequently reported that neither of these individuals were members of the Concordia community.
Allegations Against Student Union Staffer
The specific allegations against Julianna Smith were detailed in an email sent to students by the Arts and Science Federation of Associations (ASFA). Smith, who serves as the campaigns co-ordinator for the CSU, received a letter from the director of CSPS on October 30.
The letter alleged that she had participated in preparing and equipping individuals who then engaged in aggressive harassment of students and caused numerous class disruptions. Furthermore, it accused her of having assisted others in gathering and wearing disguises and masks, explicitly so they could not be identified or face consequences for their behaviour. Both of these acts are clear violations of Concordia University's policies.
Despite these serious allegations, the ASFA communication praised Smith, stating she had been crucial for mobilization in Concordia. The situation raises significant questions about the role and responsibility of student unions in maintaining campus order and safety.
