LeDrew Criticizes Carney Government's Policies and Public Apathy
LeDrew Slams Carney Government and Public Apathy

In a scathing critique, commentator Stephen LeDrew has lambasted the Mark Carney government and what he perceives as widespread public apathy among Canadians. Published on February 13, 2026, LeDrew's article questions why citizens remain so docile in the face of federal actions that he claims are eroding liberties and living standards.

Economic Concerns Under Carney's Leadership

LeDrew points to recent economic data, highlighting that Canada lost 25,000 jobs in January under Carney's administration. Despite this downturn, he notes that public complaint has been minimal, with 70% of Canadians still preferring Carney over opposition leader Pierre Poilievre. This, LeDrew argues, reflects a troubling complacency.

Secret Agreement with China Raises Alarms

A major point of contention is a secret intelligence-sharing agreement between Canada and the Chinese Communist Party, executed just before the sentencing of publisher Jimmy Lai to 20 years in prison for sedition. LeDrew criticizes the lack of parliamentary debate or transparency, as MPs have been denied access to the deal's details. He warns that aligning with China could strain relationships with traditional allies like the United States and Great Britain.

Failed Promises and Declining Quality of Life

LeDrew also addresses Carney's unfulfilled promises to revive the economy through resource-based projects and pipelines, contrasting them with the reality of rising food prices and increased bureaucracy. He mentions attacks on Jewish properties by mobs, alleging inaction by authorities, and laments the erosion of democratic values for which many Canadians have historically fought.

Public Apathy and Media Influence

The article explores reasons for public acquiescence, suggesting that years of government-led guilt over issues like genocide and resource economies have worn down citizens. LeDrew accuses the taxpayer-subsidized press of portraying Carney favorably while demonizing Poilievre, contributing to a loss of critical will among Canadians.

Call to Action for Civil Society

In conclusion, LeDrew urges Canadians to reject what he calls anti-colonialist rhetoric and regain faith in traditional values. He emphasizes that unless people stand up against policies damaging civil society, they risk losing cherished privileges. The piece ends with a rallying cry to stop tolerating what he deems idiocy and to actively defend democratic principles.