Conservative MP's Public Campaign for Don Cherry's Order of Canada Ignites Political Storm
In the world of politics, there are deliberate provocations and there are accidental blunders. When Conservative MP Andrew Lawton launched a public petition to award former hockey broadcaster Don Cherry the Order of Canada, he didn't just kick a hornet's nest—he stumbled headfirst into a political minefield that has divided opinion across the nation.
The Controversial Figure at the Center of the Debate
Don Cherry, the iconic hockey personality known for his flamboyant suits and unfiltered commentary, has long been a polarizing figure in Canadian culture. For decades, Cherry entertained hockey fans with his unique style and passionate defense of traditional hockey values. His Rock'em Sock'em Hockey videos became cultural touchstones, celebrating the physical, sometimes violent nature of the sport he loved.
However, Cherry's career came to an abrupt end in 2019 following controversial remarks about immigrants and poppy purchases. Sportsnet terminated his contract after he stated, "You people... you love our way of life, you love our milk and honey, at least you can pay a couple bucks for a poppy or something like that." This wasn't his first controversial statement—he had previously made comments about Europeans, French Canadians, and female sports reporters—but it proved to be the final straw for his broadcasting career.
The Political Gamble That Backfired
Seven years after his dismissal, Conservative MP Andrew Lawton decided to champion Cherry's cause through a very public campaign. Lawton, who has himself faced criticism for past statements about LGBTQ+ communities and abortion, initiated a petition to award Cherry the Order of Canada. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre quickly endorsed the effort, declaring that "Don Cherry embodies what it means to be a proud Canadian."
The move immediately sparked controversy within political circles. Pierre Paul-Hus, Poilievre's own Quebec lieutenant, publicly criticized the petition as "a bad idea," citing Cherry's "unacceptable remarks toward the Quebec nation and francophones." The disagreement exposed regional tensions within the Conservative Party and turned what might have been a quiet discussion into a national debate.
Why Public Campaigns Doom Order of Canada Nominations
According to political insiders, Lawton's approach may have permanently damaged Cherry's chances for the honor. Warren Kinsella, a former Liberal strategist, recalls advice from former Governor General Romeo LeBlanc: "Never, ever start a campaign for the Order of Canada." LeBlanc emphasized that the honor should be approached with humility and discretion, not through public petitions and political pressure.
"It's not like running for president of your student council," LeBlanc reportedly said. "Don't start a petition, don't put up signs. You're supposed to keep quiet, keep it private, and be humble when you get it. It's more Canadian."
This traditional approach contrasts sharply with Lawton's very public campaign, which has turned Cherry's potential recognition into a political football. The controversy has overshadowed Cherry's genuine contributions to Canadian hockey culture and shifted focus to partisan divisions.
The Broader Implications for Canadian Honors
The Don Cherry controversy raises important questions about how Canada recognizes its citizens' contributions. The Order of Canada represents the country's highest civilian honor, traditionally awarded based on merit rather than political campaigning. By turning Cherry's nomination into a public spectacle, Lawton may have violated the unwritten rules governing these honors.
Some observers argue that Cherry, seven years after his controversial remarks, might deserve consideration based on his overall impact on Canadian sports broadcasting. However, the very public nature of the campaign has made objective assessment nearly impossible. The political dimensions now dominate the conversation, with Conservative support for Cherry being framed as either principled advocacy or cynical politicking depending on one's perspective.
The episode serves as a cautionary tale about mixing politics with national honors. While Cherry's supporters genuinely believe he deserves recognition, their approach may have ensured he never receives it. The controversy continues to unfold, with media commentators and political figures weighing in on both sides of the debate.
