Instagram Chief Testifies in Landmark Case on Social Media Harms
In a high-profile court appearance, Instagram CEO Adam Mosseri stated that he does not believe individuals can become clinically addicted to social media platforms. The testimony occurred on Wednesday, February 11, 2026, in Los Angeles, as part of a landmark legal case aiming to hold technology companies accountable for alleged harms inflicted on children through their services.
Mosseri's Stance on Social Media Use
During the proceedings, Mosseri, who leads one of the world's most popular social media applications, argued against the notion of clinical addiction to platforms like Instagram. He emphasized that while social media can be habit-forming and engaging, it does not meet the medical criteria for addiction in the same way as substances or certain behaviors recognized by health authorities.
This testimony comes amid growing scrutiny from lawmakers, parents, and mental health advocates who have raised concerns about the impact of prolonged social media usage on young people's well-being. Critics point to studies linking excessive screen time to issues such as anxiety, depression, and disrupted sleep patterns among adolescents.
Context of the Legal Battle
The case represents a significant legal challenge for the tech industry, as it seeks to establish corporate responsibility for user experiences on digital platforms. Plaintiffs in the lawsuit allege that social media companies, including Instagram's parent company Meta, have designed their products in ways that exploit psychological vulnerabilities, particularly in minors, to maximize engagement and advertising revenue.
Mosseri's appearance in court underscores the escalating pressure on tech executives to address these concerns publicly. In recent years, similar cases and legislative efforts have emerged globally, prompting companies to introduce features like usage timers and parental controls, though critics argue these measures are insufficient.
Broader Implications for Tech Regulation
The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how social media platforms are regulated and held liable for content and design choices. If the court rules against the tech companies, it may lead to stricter oversight, mandatory safety protocols, or even financial penalties, reshaping the industry's approach to user protection.
Meanwhile, mental health professionals continue to debate the classification of social media addiction. Some experts advocate for its recognition as a behavioral disorder, citing evidence of withdrawal symptoms and compulsive use, while others caution against overmedicalizing normal technology use.
As the trial progresses, Mosseri's testimony highlights the ongoing tension between innovation and responsibility in the digital age, with significant implications for future policies and corporate practices in the tech sector.
