Heightened School Security Measures Spark Anxiety Among Students and Educators
School Security Measures Cause Anxiety in Canadian Schools

Heightened School Security Measures Spark Anxiety Among Students and Educators

The tragic mass shooting at Tumbler Ridge Secondary School in British Columbia on February 11, 2026, has ignited nationwide concerns about school safety across Canada. While educational authorities are urgently reviewing and strengthening security protocols, mental health experts are raising alarms about the inevitable anxiety that accompanies these heightened measures.

Alberta's Response to School Safety Concerns

In Alberta, Education Minister Demetrios Nicolaides has directed all school boards to conduct comprehensive audits of their safety protocols. While maintaining that Alberta's schools remain fundamentally safe environments, Nicolaides has mandated thorough reviews of security infrastructure. These audits include verifying that all doors lock properly, intercom systems function correctly, and safety equipment is appropriately positioned and maintained.

The Calgary Board of Education has acknowledged taking all potential threats to school communities seriously while simultaneously recognizing the anxiety such security measures can generate among students, staff, and parents. In an official statement, the board emphasized the importance of emotional support following traumatic events.

"An event such as Tumbler Ridge may affect individuals in different ways, and it is important to seek support when needed. Students are encouraged to speak with their family members about their feelings and to lean on trusted supports as they process the news about this incident," the statement read.

Teacher Perspectives and Mental Health Resources

At the annual Calgary City Teachers' Convention, which convened shortly after the shooting, the atmosphere remained notably subdued as educators grappled with the tragedy's aftermath. Teachers emphasized that meaningful change requires listening to educator experiences, expanding mental health resources, and increasing funding for schools to address both physical security and psychological wellbeing.

Alan Campbell, president of the Canadian School Boards Association and a school trustee in Manitoba, confirmed that most provincial education ministries mandate regular emergency training and drills for schools. These protocols are designed to prepare students and staff for potential threats while maintaining educational continuity.

Lockdown Protocols Across Canadian Schools

Schools across Canada have implemented rigorous safety measures for years. In Toronto, the school board maintains established policies dedicated to lockdown procedures. Each school must conduct two lockdown drills annually to ensure students and staff understand emergency protocols.

The Toronto policy defines lockdown as "used in a serious emergency situation where the threat is inside a school, on or very near to school property. A Lockdown minimizes access and visibility in an effort to shelter students, staff and visitors in secure locations." During these drills, lights are turned off, curtains or blinds are closed, cell phone use is restricted, and everyone inside the building must remain quiet.

Controversy Surrounding Lockdown Drills

Despite widespread implementation, lockdown drills remain controversial in some educational circles. In Montreal, where some of Canada's most horrific mass shootings have occurred—including the 1989 École Polytechnique tragedy that claimed 14 young women's lives—the French school board decided several years ago to keep annual lockdown drills optional rather than mandatory.

Marie-José Mastromonaco, former vice-chair of the Commission scolaire de Montréal, explained this decision by noting that young children can confuse imaginary situations with reality, potentially causing them to perceive school as an unsafe environment. She also highlighted that children who have experienced trauma, including immigrants from war zones, may be particularly affected by such drills.

This nuanced approach reflects growing recognition that while physical security measures are essential, their psychological impact on vulnerable populations requires careful consideration and balanced implementation.