Liberals Send Debate at Two Committees Behind Closed Doors, Prompting Conservative Criticism
The Liberal government has moved debates in two parliamentary committees behind closed doors, drawing sharp criticism from Conservative MPs who accuse the governing party of evading transparency and accountability. The decision affects the committees on public safety and natural resources, where sensitive discussions are now shielded from public view.
Conservative MP Dan Mazier, who raised the issue during question period in the House of Commons on Monday, February 23, 2026, argued that the move undermines democratic oversight. "Canadians deserve to see their elected officials debating issues that affect their lives," Mazier said. "Shutting the doors is an insult to taxpayers."
Government House leader Karina Gould defended the decision, stating that closed sessions are sometimes necessary to discuss confidential matters, such as national security or commercial sensitivities. "We are committed to transparency wherever possible, but certain topics require discretion," Gould said in a statement.
Political analysts note that the move comes amid heightened tensions in Parliament, with the Liberals facing scrutiny over their handling of the economy and public safety. The committees in question are examining issues ranging from firearm regulations to critical mineral development.
In response, the Conservatives have vowed to push for a motion to force the committees back into the open. "We will not let the Liberals hide their failures," said Conservative House leader Andrew Scheer. "This is a pattern of secrecy that must be stopped."
The controversy adds to a growing list of procedural disputes in the current session, as opposition parties accuse the government of limiting debate and rushing legislation.
